This is the blog for CSIT 70 Web 2.0 at Palomar College by Instructor Teresa Pelkie, Spring 2009. This blog contains summaries of the class lectures and video podcasts. The main class is located at http://csit70.pbwiki.com
…
continue reading
CSWB 110 - Web Page Development Using HTML and XHTML - at Palomar College, San Marcos, CA - Instructor Teresa Pelkie.This show will consist of video recordings of the PowerPoint presentations and / or code display for the classes in this course.
…
continue reading
These podcasts were created in Spring 2009 for CSIT 70 Web 2.0, an online class at Palomar College, San Marcos, CA with Instructor Teresa Pelkie
…
continue reading
Dig deep into current research on campus, career pathways after college, the lives and stories of your professors including their mistakes, misconceptions, and inspiring moments Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/davis-luanava/support
…
continue reading
Titillating woman. Tantalizing conversations. Tushalicious Talk is a series of tantalizing conversations with community leaders by a titillating woman harnessing her divine feminine energy, holistically and politically, to influence public policy, voter awareness, and hands on advocacy in an effort to attain beautifully balanced communities. Hosted by Jakky Lynette.
…
continue reading
Audio of Supreme Court opinions. Finally. Listen to full-length readings of the most current opinions as they are issued by the Court. Or, browse through a library containing dozens of landmark opinions from the past. Either way, it’s free! A rare find for SCOTUS nerds.
…
continue reading
…
continue reading
College of William & Mary Mason School of Business presents a podcast hosted by current MBA students discussing entrepreneurship with some of today's business leaders. The program features reoccurring interviews with professors, business owners, and other creative personalities in the Mid-Atlantic region and beyond.
…
continue reading
I hope you will follow me to my Youtube channel where I will continue to offer free access to all 350+ past episodes and audio of future high-profile Supreme Court opinions. www.whatSCOTUSwroteus.comPippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
NEW: Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries | Federal Arbitration Act, Transportation Workers
18:17
18:17
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
18:17
Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC., decided April 12, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
NEW: FBI v. Fikre | Mootness, No Fly List
17:54
17:54
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
17:54
The unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, decided March 19, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
NEW: DeVillier v. Texas | Fifth Amendment Takings Clause
11:38
11:38
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
11:38
The unanimous opinion of the Court in DeVillier v. Texas, decided April 16, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Live Summary of the Trump Criminal Cases | Palomar College
55:06
55:06
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
55:06
I have something a little different for you today: since I often read documents from the Trump cases on the show, I thought my super nerds might be interested in hearing the audio from a guest lecture I gave last week summarizing the four Trump criminal cases at a Palomar College event held every semester called the Political Economy Days Lecture S…
…
continue reading
1
MacQuarie Infrastructure v. Moab Partners | Securities Exchange Act § 10(b)
15:31
15:31
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
15:31
The unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in MacQuarie Infrastructure Corporation, et al. v. Moab Partners, L.P., et al., decided April 12, 2024. The Court is asked whether the Second Circuit erred in holding-in conflict with the Third, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits- that a failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 can support a private …
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Pulsifer v. United States | Safety-valve Relief, Mandatory Minimum Sentences
30:04
30:04
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
30:04
Part 2 of 2 of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pulsifer v. United States, decided March 15, 2024. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-340_p86a.pdf A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U. S. C. §3553(f)(1) only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three con…
…
continue reading
1
Pulsifer v. United States | Safety-valve Relief, Mandatory Minimum Sentences
39:54
39:54
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
39:54
Part 1 of 2 of the opinion of the Supreme Court in Pulsifer v. United States, decided March 15, 2024. A criminal defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U. S. C. §3553(f)(1) only if the defendant satisfies each of the provision’s three conditions. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get pod…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States
29:36
29:36
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
29:36
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States
23:19
23:19
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
23:19
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. If you are interested in listening to the oral arguments in this case, they are scheduled to take place later th…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States
32:35
32:35
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
32:35
Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case)
20:20
20:20
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
20:20
Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case)
30:00
30:00
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
30:00
Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…
…
continue reading
1
Lindke v. Freed | Social Media, Public Officials, First Amendment
33:19
33:19
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
33:19
When does a public official’s social media activity constitute state action subject to the First Amendment? Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Lindke v. Freed (March 15, 2024) and find out. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.comPippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Concurrences, Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot
14:07
14:07
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
14:07
Today I'll be reading both concurring opinions (which read like dissents) in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., decided March 4, 2024.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot
27:07
27:07
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
27:07
Today I'll be reading the per curiam opinion of the Court in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., decided March 4, 2024.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board | Alito, Dissenting, Denial of Cert (Race, School Admissions)
17:38
17:38
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
17:38
Alito, joined by Thomas, dissenting from denial of certiorari in Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board, decided Feb 20, 2024.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
An update with critical commentary regarding today's order granting certiorari in Trump v. United States (from a very unhappy host).Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Great Lakes Insurance v. Raiders Retreat Realty | Choice-of-Law Provisions in Maritime Contracts
27:11
27:11
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
27:11
Today I'll be reading the unanimous opinion of the Court in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, decided Feb 21, 2024.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
McElrath v. Georgia | Double Jeopardy, Repugnancy Doctrine
18:03
18:03
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
18:03
Justice Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in McElrath v. Georgia (Feb 21, 2024)Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
"Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be 'labeled as bigots and treated as such' by the government," wrote Justice Alito, in his statement explaining why he concurred in the denial of certiorari in Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Finney (February 20, 2024).…
…
continue reading
1
Smith v. Hamm | Sotomayor, Dissenting from Denials of Stay and Certiorari (Execution by Nitrogen Hypoxia)
9:39
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari in Smith v. Hamm (January 25, 2024). Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsPippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz | Fair Credit Reporting Act; Federal Government Sovereign Immunity
42:13
42:13
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
42:13
The brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, decided February 8, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsPippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Murray v. USB Securities | Whistleblower Protection
31:20
31:20
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
31:20
Today I'll be reading the brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Murray v. USB Securities (Feb 8, 2024) regarding the whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsPippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Part 6: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
11:23
11:23
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
11:23
Final episode for this opinion. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Part 5: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
21:36
21:36
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
21:36
Next episode will be the last for this opinion. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Part 4: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
13:26
13:26
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
13:26
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
22:32
22:32
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
22:32
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
17:12
17:12
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
17:12
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion in U.S. v. Trump (Jan 6th Case)
13:21
13:21
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
13:21
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Note: These episodes may be a little…
…
continue reading
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the Trump Jan 6th case, as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity. Keep your eye out today for Part One!…
…
continue reading
1
When speech is not protected by the First Amendment | Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
10:59
10:59
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
10:59
Listen to the landmark Supreme Court opinion Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) (Free Speech, KKK, Imminent Lawless Action Test) Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Packingham v. North Carolina (2017) | Sex Offender Access to Social Media & The First Amendment
19:33
19:33
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
19:33
Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Packingham v. North Carolina (2017) Access this opinion and other helpful case information here. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006) | Public Employee Speech & The First Amendment
33:18
33:18
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
33:18
Over the next two episodes, I'll be reading two past opinions that will help us better understand two cases currently before the Court. The past opinions are Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006) and Packingham v. North Carolina (2017). The two cases currently before the Court are Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier; these two similar cases were…
…
continue reading
1
Part 4: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
26:13
26:13
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
26:13
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
16:11
16:11
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
16:11
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
34:17
34:17
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
34:17
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Blassingame v. Trump | D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion (Dec 1, 2023)
38:05
38:05
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
38:05
This is not the yet-to-be-issued D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Jan 6th criminal case against Donald Trump (although, I plan to read that opinion as soon as it is issued). Rather, it is in response to a claim of immunity made by Donald Trump in response to several civil suits brought against him for actions surrounding the even…
…
continue reading
1
Tingley v. Ferguson (2023) | Thomas & Alito Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari
12:45
12:45
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
12:45
Today I'll be reading two very brief opinions dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Tingley v. Ferguson, issued back on December 11th, 2023. The first dissent is from Justice Thomas and is only around 4 pages long; the second is Justice Alito's dissent, which is only a few paragraphs long and is written as if it were meant to be read at the e…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) | Presidential Immunity in Civil Suits
22:18
22:18
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
22:18
Listen to the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) Access the text of the opinion and other essential case information here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1981/79-1738 Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts or stream directly from your browser at whatscotuswroteus.com…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) | Presidential Immunity in Civil Suits
17:55
17:55
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
17:55
Listen to the majority opinion of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) Access the text of the opinion and other essential case information here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1981/79-1738 Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts or stream directly from your browser at https://www.whatscotuswroteus.com…
…
continue reading
1
United States v. Nixon (1974)
53:54
53:54
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
53:54
Is the President's right to safeguard certain information, using his "executive privilege" confidentiality power, entirely immune from judicial review? Listen to the full opinion of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. United States (1974). Listen to audio of Supreme Court opinions on What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts.…
…
continue reading
1
Part 4: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
22:56
22:56
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
22:56
Listen to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, D…
…
continue reading
1
Part 3: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
23:19
23:19
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
23:19
Listen to U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, D…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
28:54
28:54
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
28:54
U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, District of…
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: U.S. v. Trump | Memorandum Opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan (Dec 1, 2023)
28:59
28:59
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
28:59
U.S. District Court Judge Tanya S. Chutkan's Memorandum Opinion in response to Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the charges against him based on Presidential immunity and constitutional grounds. Decided Dec 1, 2023. This is the ruling that is currently being considered by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. United States District Court, District of…
…
continue reading
1
The Chief Justice’s 2023 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary
23:38
23:38
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
23:38
The Chief Justice's 2023 Year End Report on the Federal Judiciary If you would like to listen to this report from last year and the year before, you can find them in the show catalog by scrolling back to December 2022. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get your podcasts, or at www.whatscotuswroteus.com…
…
continue reading
1
Part 2: Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. | Colorado Primary Ballot Petition for Writ of Certiorari
25:26
25:26
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
25:26
Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al., filed January 4, 2023.Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading
1
Part 1: Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. | Colorado Primary Ballot Petition for Writ of Certiorari
28:53
28:53
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
28:53
Today I'll be reading Donald Trump's petition for writ of certiorari regarding the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to exclude him from the Colorado primary election ballot - a petition that the Court recently granted. I know I still owe you all a second half to the Nixon opinion, but I've had a lot of listeners requesting to hear these documents,…
…
continue reading
Just a one-minute update regarding some technical difficulties…Pippah Getchell tarafından oluşturuldu
…
continue reading