Artwork

İçerik David Schmitt tarafından sağlanmıştır. Bölümler, grafikler ve podcast açıklamaları dahil tüm podcast içeriği doğrudan David Schmitt veya podcast platform ortağı tarafından yüklenir ve sağlanır. Birinin telif hakkıyla korunan çalışmanızı izniniz olmadan kullandığını düşünüyorsanız burada https://tr.player.fm/legal özetlenen süreci takip edebilirsiniz.
Player FM - Podcast Uygulaması
Player FM uygulamasıyla çevrimdışı Player FM !

Episode 12: Viral Spike Protein Alone--Apart from Infection with Viral Nucleic Acid--Damages Cells Lining Blood Vessels

35:24
 
Paylaş
 

Manage episode 297885868 series 2953518
İçerik David Schmitt tarafından sağlanmıştır. Bölümler, grafikler ve podcast açıklamaları dahil tüm podcast içeriği doğrudan David Schmitt veya podcast platform ortağı tarafından yüklenir ve sağlanır. Birinin telif hakkıyla korunan çalışmanızı izniniz olmadan kullandığını düşünüyorsanız burada https://tr.player.fm/legal özetlenen süreci takip edebilirsiniz.
Joe Atwill and Dave Schmitt have a conversation regarding a recent report that the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein is, by itself, detrimental to the functioning of cells lining the blood vessels. See, Lei et al., Circ. Res., here:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
In good faith, and based on very legitimate concerns, some opposed to vaccines in general, or nucleic acid vaccinoids have interpreted this paper as indicative of the deadliness of the mRNA so-called vaccines. See here:
https://odysee.com/@DavidKnightShow:1/mRNA-%E2%80%9CSpike%E2%80%9D-Kills-Says-Salk-Institute:5
Indeed, Atwill and Schmitt agree that there are multiple grave concerns about the nucleic-acid pharmaceutical platforms that argue against these agents being used to stimulate an immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus---and more than 'used', these agents have been recklessly 'rushed into' what developers hope will be administration to every person on Earth.
The readers and the listeners should understand that the authors, Lei, et al., of the above cited paper do not make the claim that their results argue against the use of the any type of vaccine to generate protective antibody against the Spike protein (S protein, for short). The authors state: "The conclusion suggests that vaccination generated antibody and/or exogenous antibody against S protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits S protein-imposed endothelial injury."
This paper cannot be used as established evidence to demonstrate that S-proteins introduced by the vaccinoids (or pseudovaccines, if you prefer) are the cause of the adverse reactions via the mechanisms described in this paper. It is important to keep separate in our thinking the two types of S proteins that are involved in this discussion.
There are those S proteins that are present naturally on SARS-CoV-2 viruses (or in some manner on the hollow, laboratory-constructed pseudoviruses) versus the S proteins being artificially expressed as a result of insertion into host cells of mRNA of pharmaceutical origin. The S protein produced (translated) from pharmaceutically-introduced mRNA (or DNA in the case of adenovirus-based vaccinoids), putatively, is being presented on--and bound to--the cell surface. Again, this latter form of S protein is created inside artificially-infected cells and then is displayed on the exterior of those cells, embedded within the cell membrane like decorative beads on a coat. At least that is the simplified claim by the pharmaceutical industry and the powerful forces for which it is working. If this should be the case, this S protein would not be available for binding to ACE2 receptors elsewhere embedded on the membrane of this or any other cells.
On the other hand, S-protein produced by the mRNA type vaccinoid pharmaceutical (or the DNA adenovirus vaccinoid) could become liberated by some mechanism or cell-destructive process and then subsequently bind to ACE2 receptors studding the surface of cells lining blood vessels with consequential deleterious effects. These are the endothelial vascular cells (EC) referred to in this paper and this surface of the blood vessel is called the luminal surface. This possibility absolutely needs investigation. We need to know if this could be a mechanism that explains at least some of the adverse effects of the nucleic-acid vaccinoids. This process may, or may not, depend upon any incorporation by reverse transcription of information from the injected mRNA into DNA and retrotransposons---a general process that we know occurs in other circumstances. This is a separate, additional and very real concern---if not likelihood.
There are research methods that would permit the labeling and, thereby, the identification of the source of S protein from a virus (or pseudovirus) versus the S protein translated from a nucleic acid vaccinoid. Finding, identifying and distinguishing these in deep tissues of the brain, heart or kidneys versus merely at the injection site would be extremely significant.
The public is facing an enormous challenge of obtaining good information. Information can, en route via a channel, carrier or medium from a sender (and his transmitter) to an observer (via the receiver), be partially or wholly corrupted. This can happen as the result of random, physical noise degrading the signal. A bad telephone connection is an example of this type of degradation of message. Distortion of the message can also result from innocent, human error. This would be a case of misinformation. A generalized example of this occurs in the children's game of 'Telephone' where an original message is modified, often with humorous outcome, as one individual passes a tale along a chain--the channel in this case--of intermediaries in gossip-like fashion. And, lastly, a decrease in the fidelity of a message as it travels along a channel can occur when a malicious message is substituted or added to the original message. This defines a case of deliberate dysinformation. Propaganda, psyops (psychological operations), fraud, lying and neurolinguistic programming coming from sources of controlled opposition (President Biden and Tucker Carlson, both) are exemplary of this type of malevolent messaging.
For a summary diagram of the Shannon-Weaver scheme, see the image associated with the banner heading of this specific podcast.
The serious, philosophical discipline of attempting to describe means of knowing how we know something is called epistemology. This involves scientific tools for assigning degrees of certainty to observed or measured objects and events. Forensic analysis, logic, critical thinking and the application of philosophical and historical experience adds to the building of more reliable, contextualized understandings of any matter in question. All of these things have been placed at risk within this current regime of conglomerated power throughout every institution of society. This is why Atwill and Schmitt insist upon our developing a mature understanding of the Fascistic bundling and capture of all of what would be—and should be--reliable channels of information, knowledge and wisdom. Thus, the Central Dogma of Biology, the usual flow of the defining information of who we are biologically as individual organisms, must be seen in a broader sense of what we call here, at the Second Society Project, as the Central Dogma of Civilization. This dogma involves the fundamental core of information not only about biology, but of religion, history, politics, law, science, medicine, technology and the arts. It also involves the channels of communicating that information via the relevant messengers out to the fora of human activity in homes, churches, classrooms, laboratories, factory floors, hospitals, courtrooms and the marketplace.
Mankind must take repossession of the communication scheme that is describable as the Central Dogma of Civilization away from the Oligarchs and their secret operations and inner societies and retain it for itself.
In order to do this, we must use the best critical, investigative, analytic, argumentative and conversational methods available. We need to encourage young individuals to enter the fields of science, mathematics, engineering, medicine, law and the arts. We need to conquer new territories within these specialties as parts of the grand end of maintaining Civilization and incorporating innovations, not by means of disruption as is currently popularized, but by means of integration of the legitimately novel with the traditional. In this manner, we can secure our future and our flourishing.
  continue reading

20 bölüm

Artwork
iconPaylaş
 
Manage episode 297885868 series 2953518
İçerik David Schmitt tarafından sağlanmıştır. Bölümler, grafikler ve podcast açıklamaları dahil tüm podcast içeriği doğrudan David Schmitt veya podcast platform ortağı tarafından yüklenir ve sağlanır. Birinin telif hakkıyla korunan çalışmanızı izniniz olmadan kullandığını düşünüyorsanız burada https://tr.player.fm/legal özetlenen süreci takip edebilirsiniz.
Joe Atwill and Dave Schmitt have a conversation regarding a recent report that the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein is, by itself, detrimental to the functioning of cells lining the blood vessels. See, Lei et al., Circ. Res., here:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
In good faith, and based on very legitimate concerns, some opposed to vaccines in general, or nucleic acid vaccinoids have interpreted this paper as indicative of the deadliness of the mRNA so-called vaccines. See here:
https://odysee.com/@DavidKnightShow:1/mRNA-%E2%80%9CSpike%E2%80%9D-Kills-Says-Salk-Institute:5
Indeed, Atwill and Schmitt agree that there are multiple grave concerns about the nucleic-acid pharmaceutical platforms that argue against these agents being used to stimulate an immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus---and more than 'used', these agents have been recklessly 'rushed into' what developers hope will be administration to every person on Earth.
The readers and the listeners should understand that the authors, Lei, et al., of the above cited paper do not make the claim that their results argue against the use of the any type of vaccine to generate protective antibody against the Spike protein (S protein, for short). The authors state: "The conclusion suggests that vaccination generated antibody and/or exogenous antibody against S protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits S protein-imposed endothelial injury."
This paper cannot be used as established evidence to demonstrate that S-proteins introduced by the vaccinoids (or pseudovaccines, if you prefer) are the cause of the adverse reactions via the mechanisms described in this paper. It is important to keep separate in our thinking the two types of S proteins that are involved in this discussion.
There are those S proteins that are present naturally on SARS-CoV-2 viruses (or in some manner on the hollow, laboratory-constructed pseudoviruses) versus the S proteins being artificially expressed as a result of insertion into host cells of mRNA of pharmaceutical origin. The S protein produced (translated) from pharmaceutically-introduced mRNA (or DNA in the case of adenovirus-based vaccinoids), putatively, is being presented on--and bound to--the cell surface. Again, this latter form of S protein is created inside artificially-infected cells and then is displayed on the exterior of those cells, embedded within the cell membrane like decorative beads on a coat. At least that is the simplified claim by the pharmaceutical industry and the powerful forces for which it is working. If this should be the case, this S protein would not be available for binding to ACE2 receptors elsewhere embedded on the membrane of this or any other cells.
On the other hand, S-protein produced by the mRNA type vaccinoid pharmaceutical (or the DNA adenovirus vaccinoid) could become liberated by some mechanism or cell-destructive process and then subsequently bind to ACE2 receptors studding the surface of cells lining blood vessels with consequential deleterious effects. These are the endothelial vascular cells (EC) referred to in this paper and this surface of the blood vessel is called the luminal surface. This possibility absolutely needs investigation. We need to know if this could be a mechanism that explains at least some of the adverse effects of the nucleic-acid vaccinoids. This process may, or may not, depend upon any incorporation by reverse transcription of information from the injected mRNA into DNA and retrotransposons---a general process that we know occurs in other circumstances. This is a separate, additional and very real concern---if not likelihood.
There are research methods that would permit the labeling and, thereby, the identification of the source of S protein from a virus (or pseudovirus) versus the S protein translated from a nucleic acid vaccinoid. Finding, identifying and distinguishing these in deep tissues of the brain, heart or kidneys versus merely at the injection site would be extremely significant.
The public is facing an enormous challenge of obtaining good information. Information can, en route via a channel, carrier or medium from a sender (and his transmitter) to an observer (via the receiver), be partially or wholly corrupted. This can happen as the result of random, physical noise degrading the signal. A bad telephone connection is an example of this type of degradation of message. Distortion of the message can also result from innocent, human error. This would be a case of misinformation. A generalized example of this occurs in the children's game of 'Telephone' where an original message is modified, often with humorous outcome, as one individual passes a tale along a chain--the channel in this case--of intermediaries in gossip-like fashion. And, lastly, a decrease in the fidelity of a message as it travels along a channel can occur when a malicious message is substituted or added to the original message. This defines a case of deliberate dysinformation. Propaganda, psyops (psychological operations), fraud, lying and neurolinguistic programming coming from sources of controlled opposition (President Biden and Tucker Carlson, both) are exemplary of this type of malevolent messaging.
For a summary diagram of the Shannon-Weaver scheme, see the image associated with the banner heading of this specific podcast.
The serious, philosophical discipline of attempting to describe means of knowing how we know something is called epistemology. This involves scientific tools for assigning degrees of certainty to observed or measured objects and events. Forensic analysis, logic, critical thinking and the application of philosophical and historical experience adds to the building of more reliable, contextualized understandings of any matter in question. All of these things have been placed at risk within this current regime of conglomerated power throughout every institution of society. This is why Atwill and Schmitt insist upon our developing a mature understanding of the Fascistic bundling and capture of all of what would be—and should be--reliable channels of information, knowledge and wisdom. Thus, the Central Dogma of Biology, the usual flow of the defining information of who we are biologically as individual organisms, must be seen in a broader sense of what we call here, at the Second Society Project, as the Central Dogma of Civilization. This dogma involves the fundamental core of information not only about biology, but of religion, history, politics, law, science, medicine, technology and the arts. It also involves the channels of communicating that information via the relevant messengers out to the fora of human activity in homes, churches, classrooms, laboratories, factory floors, hospitals, courtrooms and the marketplace.
Mankind must take repossession of the communication scheme that is describable as the Central Dogma of Civilization away from the Oligarchs and their secret operations and inner societies and retain it for itself.
In order to do this, we must use the best critical, investigative, analytic, argumentative and conversational methods available. We need to encourage young individuals to enter the fields of science, mathematics, engineering, medicine, law and the arts. We need to conquer new territories within these specialties as parts of the grand end of maintaining Civilization and incorporating innovations, not by means of disruption as is currently popularized, but by means of integration of the legitimately novel with the traditional. In this manner, we can secure our future and our flourishing.
  continue reading

20 bölüm

Tüm bölümler

×
 
Loading …

Player FM'e Hoş Geldiniz!

Player FM şu anda sizin için internetteki yüksek kalitedeki podcast'leri arıyor. En iyi podcast uygulaması ve Android, iPhone ve internet üzerinde çalışıyor. Aboneliklerinizi cihazlar arasında eş zamanlamak için üye olun.

 

Hızlı referans rehberi