Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
38 subscribers
Checked 10h ago
beş yıl önce eklendi
İçerik Jessica Levinson tarafından sağlanmıştır. Bölümler, grafikler ve podcast açıklamaları dahil tüm podcast içeriği doğrudan Jessica Levinson veya podcast platform ortağı tarafından yüklenir ve sağlanır. Birinin telif hakkıyla korunan çalışmanızı izniniz olmadan kullandığını düşünüyorsanız burada https://tr.player.fm/legal özetlenen süreci takip edebilirsiniz.
Player FM - Podcast Uygulaması
Player FM uygulamasıyla çevrimdışı Player FM !
Player FM uygulamasıyla çevrimdışı Player FM !
Passing Judgment
Tümünü oynan(ma)dı işaretle ...
Manage series 2738868
İçerik Jessica Levinson tarafından sağlanmıştır. Bölümler, grafikler ve podcast açıklamaları dahil tüm podcast içeriği doğrudan Jessica Levinson veya podcast platform ortağı tarafından yüklenir ve sağlanır. Birinin telif hakkıyla korunan çalışmanızı izniniz olmadan kullandığını düşünüyorsanız burada https://tr.player.fm/legal özetlenen süreci takip edebilirsiniz.
Is the constitution in crisis? This podcast is for people who are curious about politics and the law and how the biggest political and legal issues of the moment affect you. Pull up a chair and join host Jessica Levinson, a professor at LMU’s Loyola Law School, and a rotating cast of experts. Jessica will be joined by journalists, politicians, political scientists, lawyers, and many others. Listen to Jessica and her guests for a wry, and sometimes irreverent take on the most pressing issues of our time. What are the laws of our democracy? How are they changing? And what does that mean for your daily life?
…
continue reading
322 bölüm
Tümünü oynan(ma)dı işaretle ...
Manage series 2738868
İçerik Jessica Levinson tarafından sağlanmıştır. Bölümler, grafikler ve podcast açıklamaları dahil tüm podcast içeriği doğrudan Jessica Levinson veya podcast platform ortağı tarafından yüklenir ve sağlanır. Birinin telif hakkıyla korunan çalışmanızı izniniz olmadan kullandığını düşünüyorsanız burada https://tr.player.fm/legal özetlenen süreci takip edebilirsiniz.
Is the constitution in crisis? This podcast is for people who are curious about politics and the law and how the biggest political and legal issues of the moment affect you. Pull up a chair and join host Jessica Levinson, a professor at LMU’s Loyola Law School, and a rotating cast of experts. Jessica will be joined by journalists, politicians, political scientists, lawyers, and many others. Listen to Jessica and her guests for a wry, and sometimes irreverent take on the most pressing issues of our time. What are the laws of our democracy? How are they changing? And what does that mean for your daily life?
…
continue reading
322 bölüm
Tüm bölümler
×P
Passing Judgment
1 Examining the Four Criminal Cases Against Trump 13:08
13:08
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
13:08In this episode of Passing Judgment, we unravel the current status of the four pending criminal cases against former President Trump. Host Jessica Levinson explains that while Trump was convicted in the New York State hush money case, he received no real sentencing. The Georgia election interference case stalled due to conflict of interest allegations against the district attorney. Jessica provides a detailed overview of each case and what it means now that Trump is set to return to office. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: New York State Hush Money Case: Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts related to falsifying business records for hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. However, the sentence resulted in no jail time, fines, or probation due to constitutional concerns about punishing a sitting president. Georgia Election Interference Case: This case, involving Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, stalled due to conflict of interest allegations against District Attorney Fani Willis. The delay and constitutional concerns have put the case on indefinite hold. Federal Cases: Both the DC election interference and Mar-a-Lago classified documents cases stalled due to legal challenges and questions of immunity. Following Trump's recent election victory, Special Counsel Jack Smith resigned, and the cases were effectively closed. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 What’s Next for TikTok? Supreme Court to Rule on Nationwide Ban 10:23
10:23
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
10:23In this episode of Passing Judgment, we analyze the high-stakes TikTok ban case as it heads to the Supreme Court on an accelerated timeline. Host Jessica Levinson explains the key arguments: ByteDance claims the ban violates First Amendment rights, while the government cites national security concerns over TikTok's Chinese ownership. With oral arguments set for January 10th, Jessica discusses potential outcomes and actions President Trump might take once in office. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Overview of the Legislation: The law in question mandates that TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, divest its U.S. operations by January 19th, 2024, or face a nationwide ban. The ban would affect app stores and Internet providers, eventually causing TikTok to stop working as updates and downloads would be prohibited. 2️⃣ Lower Court Rulings: The DC Circuit upheld the law as constitutional. A three-judge panel determined that the national security concerns cited by Congress justify the legislation. Judges generally defer to the political branches on national security issues. 3️⃣ Arguments by ByteDance and TikTok: ByteDance argues that the law violates the First Amendment by eliminating a mode of communication without a compelling government interest. They contend that the national security concerns are baseless and accuse the U.S. government of targeting TikTok based on its content, which is potentially a content-based restriction—a key concern in First Amendment law. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Supreme Court to Hear TikTok Ban Case and Justice Alito Flag Controversy 12:22
12:22
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
12:22In this episode of Passing Judgment, we unpack two significant legal developments. First, Jessica covers the Supreme Court's expedited review of the TikTok ban, weighing national security concerns against First Amendment rights. Then, she dives into the controversy surrounding a federal judge who criticized Justice Alito over flags flown at his residences, examining the broader implications for judicial impartiality and trust. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ ByteDance's Argument: ByteDance argues that restricting its platform violates users' First Amendment rights and contends that national security concerns are either exaggerated or unfounded. 2️⃣ Potential Actions by President Trump Regarding TikTok case: President Trump could instruct the Attorney General not to enforce the law, attempt to persuade Congress to repeal it despite bipartisan support, argue that the law no longer applies if a qualified divestiture occurs, or advocate for the sale of TikTok to an American company. 3️⃣ Judiciary Impartiality and Trust Issues: Judicial impartiality is crucial for maintaining public trust, and any erosion of respect for the judiciary could potentially lead to a constitutional crisis, as emphasized by quotes from Justice Thurgood Marshall underscoring the importance of civic duty. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 The Future of Voting Rights Under the Trump Administration with Sam Levine 25:25
25:25
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
25:25In this episode of Passing Judgment, Jessica sits down with Sam Levine from The Guardian to unpack the future of voting rights under the Trump administration. They explore the role of the Department of Justice, the impact of stalled federal legislation, and the current state of the Voting Rights Act. Sam also clarifies common misconceptions about election fraud and administration, highlighting what to watch for in the coming years. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Trump Administration and Voting Rights: Sam Levine outlines the anticipated approach of the Trump administration regarding voting rights, including the potential use of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to challenge election outcomes and influence election administration. 2️⃣ Role and Powers of the Department of Justice: The DOJ's role in enforcing federal laws, particularly civil rights and voting rights laws, is explained. Shifts in administration can significantly alter DOJ priorities. 3️⃣ Election Security and Misconceptions : The podcast addresses common misconceptions about voter fraud and the robustness of election systems. Sam Levine stresses the rarity of voter fraud and the extensive safeguards in place. Follow Our Host and Guest: @LevinsonJessica @srl…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Supreme Court Cases: Youth Transgender Care and FDA Regulation of Vapes with David Ovalle 23:45
23:45
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
23:45In this episode of Passing Judgment , we explore a pivotal Supreme Court case that could redefine federal agency power. Jessica is joined by journalist David Ovalle to unpack the FDA's authority over e-cigarette regulation and the legal battle surrounding its rejection of flavored vape products. Plus, Jessica delves into a critical Supreme Court hearing on transgender healthcare for minors, shedding light on the stakes and potential implications. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ FDA Regulation of Vaping Products: There's a high volume of applications for vaping product approvals, but only a few have been approved. The debate surrounds the popular and attractive fruity-flavored vapes, which are targeted for regulation due to concerns about their appeal to young people. 2️⃣ Legal Challenges and Circuit Split: The 5th Circuit Court ruled that the FDA acted arbitrarily and capriciously, a decision that challenges the FDA’s authority and methods. This created a split among appellate courts. 3️⃣ Parent's Rights in Transgender Care Case: A new argument based on the due process clause regarding parents' rights to direct their children's medical care might offer a different legal challenge in the future. Follow Our Host and Guest: @LevinsonJessica @DavidOvalle305…
P
Passing Judgment
1 The Implications of Trump’s Tariff Proposals and Hunter Biden’s Pardon 16:56
16:56
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
16:56In this episode of Passing Judgment, we delve into the legal complexities of President-Elect Trump's proposed tariffs. Jessica Levinson explores how power over foreign commerce has shifted from Congress to the President, highlighting key laws like the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934 and the Trade Act of 1974. The episode also covers President Biden's controversial pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, examining the constitutional power of presidential pardons, historical precedents, and political implications. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Congressional Abdication of Trade Powers: Jessica Levinson points out that Congress has gradually ceded its constitutional authority to regulate foreign commerce to the executive branch over the past century. 2️⃣ Legal Hurdles for Trump's Proposed Tariffs: Despite President-elect Trump's promises to impose sweeping tariffs on countries like Mexico, Canada, and China, there are significant legal and procedural hurdles to clear. These include mandatory investigations by the Department of Commerce, and potential court challenges under doctrines like the major questions doctrine and nondelegation doctrine. 3️⃣ Presidential Pardons and Political Implications: The episode delves into President Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, explaining the broad and exclusive presidential power to grant pardons for federal crimes. Resources Mentioned: Jessica's MSNBC article Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Legal Updates: Menendez Brothers' Appeal and Proposed Transgender Bathroom Bill 13:01
13:01
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
13:01In this episode of Passing Judgment, Jessica provides updates on two prominent legal stories. She delves into the Menendez brothers' ongoing legal challenges, including their bids for resentencing, a habeas petition, and clemency, explaining the possible outcomes. Jessica also analyzes a proposed bill by Congresswoman Nancy Mace that seeks to ban transgender individuals from using bathrooms aligned with their gender identity in federal buildings. She breaks down the legal scrutiny surrounding such laws and relevant court precedents. Happy Thanksgiving! Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Menendez Brothers Resentencing Claim: They're pushing for resentencing based on their model behavior in prison and the argument that they were victims of severe sexual abuse by their father. 2️⃣ Proposed Transgender Bathroom Bill: Congresswoman Nancy Mace introduced a bill aiming to ban transgender individuals from using bathrooms aligning with their gender identity in federal buildings. 3️⃣ Classification of Law: The bill's focus on transgender individuals can be seen as a quasi-suspect classification, which is subject to intermediate scrutiny. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 What to Expect from a Second Trump Administration with Josh Gerstein 33:25
33:25
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
33:25In this episode of Passing Judgment, Jessica Levinson is joined by Josh Gerstein from Politico, they explore accusations of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia, recent appeals, and the constitutional questions of prosecuting a sitting president. The episode highlights the Georgia Court of Appeals' decision to pause the case, logistical and legal complexities if Trump were to face jail time, and the broader implications for presidential power. They also discuss the potential impact of a second Trump administration on the DOJ and strategies from the Biden administration to solidify its policies. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Constitutional and Supreme Court Considerations : There is a discussion on whether a state can prosecute a sitting president, involving constitutional implications and the Supreme Court’s views on presidential power and immunity. Historical cases like Clinton v. Jones are referenced. 2️⃣ Trump's Legal Troubles and Sentencing Complexities : Trump's legal issues are detailed, including complications stemming from his behavior during trials, contempt issues, and potential sentencing challenges, especially given his status as a former president. 3️⃣ Transition Strategies of the Biden Administration : Potential strategic moves by the Biden administration to solidify policies before a Trump reentry, such as issuing pardons and "midnight regulations," are contemplated. Follow Our Host and guest: @LevinsonJessica @Joshgerstein…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Analyzing Trump's 2024 Reelection and Its Legal Implications 18:14
18:14
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
18:14In this episode of Passing Judgment, we dive into the immediate aftermath of the 2024 election results. Jessica discusses the implications of President Trump's return to the Oval Office, the Republican trifecta in controlling the White House, Senate, and likely the House of Representatives. Join us as Jessica unpacks the pending federal and state legal cases against Trump, explores possible legal challenges and strategies over the next four years, and examines significant legal issues such as federal power, immigration, the Department of Justice, environmental policies and more. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Legal Cases Against Trump : Federal cases against Trump, including the DC election interference and Mar-a-Lago documents cases, may be dismissed when Trump regains office and appoints new officials. 2️⃣ Federal Power and Separation of Powers : With Republicans potentially controlling both legislative branches, there might be more legislation rather than executive orders. 3️⃣ Organizational Framework for Legal Issues : The episode discussed potential changes to laws, executive orders, judicial appointments, and expansions of executive power, highlighting their hypothetical nature and the need for ongoing monitoring.…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Inside the Supreme Court: Breyer Talks Legislative Intent and Judicial Ethics 1:08:17
1:08:17
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
1:08:17In this episode of Passing Judgment, we engage in a thought-provoking discussion with retired Justice Stephen Breyer. Host Jessica Levinson delves into Breyer's critique of textualism, focusing on whether "costs" in legal contexts should include educational experts. The episode also touches on public trust in the judiciary, the role of the First Amendment, and the complexities of precedent. Breyer's engaging stories and reflections provide a comprehensive perspective on modern judicial challenges. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: Critique of Textualism and Originalism: Breyer critiques the methodologies of textualism and originalism, which focus strictly on the text and original meaning of the law. He highlights the limitations of these approaches, given the evolving societal and political contexts since the laws were written. Pragmatism in Constitutional Interpretation: Advocating for a pragmatic approach, Breyer emphasizes the importance of interpreting the Constitution by considering historical context, consequences, and inherent values such as democracy and human rights. Supreme Court's Political Perception: Addressing public concerns about the Supreme Court's political influence, especially with the conservative supermajority appointed by Republican presidents, Breyer contends that legal analysis should be distinct from political thought. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
In this episode of Passing Judgment, Jessica Levinson tackles the controversial actions of Elon Musk, who has set up a lottery system pledging $1,000,000 a day to registered voters in swing states who sign a particular petition. Join us as we delve into the legal complexities and potential impacts of Musk's actions on the integrity of our democratic system. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: Electoral Integrity and the Influence of Money : Jessica explores the risks and ethical concerns surrounding the influence of money on elections. She discusses the principle that elections should not be bought and the potential for wealthy individuals like Elon Musk to influence election outcomes through financial incentives. Historical Context of Federal Laws : The discussion includes the historical foundations of federal laws aimed at limiting the impact of money on elections. She references the 1925 federal law and subsequent legislation, including the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which both aim to prevent monetary inducements related to voting and voter registration. Legal Implications and Ethical Considerations : The episode delves into the legal nuances and potential federal law violations in Musk's actions. Jessica discusses how a judge might interpret these actions and the importance of maintaining the integrity of election systems by avoiding financial incentives that could influence voter behavior. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Analyzing Harris vs Trump: Policy Insights on Economy, Abortion, and Democracy with Maggie Astor 30:29
30:29
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
30:29In this episode of Passing Judgment, we welcome New York Times reporter Maggie Astor for her first podcast appearance, diving into her comprehensive comparison of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump’s policy positions. Jessica Levinson and Maggie explore key issues like abortion, climate change, democracy, crime policy, and the economy, highlighting the vast differences in each candidate’s approach. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Abortion Standpoints: Kamala Harris is pro-choice, a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade, and advocates for protective abortion rights legislation. Donald Trump supports overturning Roe v. Wade, state-level abortion restrictions, and has ambiguous positions on a federal abortion ban. 2️⃣ Democracy: Kamala Harris is committed to upholding the democratic process and respecting election outcomes, while Donald Trump's refusal to accept the 2020 results and unwillingness to acknowledge potential future losses has fueled skepticism about the legitimacy of the electoral process. 3️⃣ Climate Change Policy: Trump opposes major climate change initiatives, having withdrawn from the Paris Agreement and supporting expanded fossil fuel production, including coal and oil. Harris supports the Paris Agreement, advocates for renewable energy, and has backed legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act to combat climate change. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 The Supreme Court's Upcoming Term and Key Cases to Watch 12:17
12:17
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
12:17In this episode of Passing Judgment, we dive into the key cases of the Supreme Court's 2024-2025 term. Jessica Levinson highlights an October 8th case on ghost guns and the ATF's regulatory powers, drawing parallels to a previous bump stock ruling. Additional cases discussed include the FDA's authority over flavored e-cigarettes, a Texas law's First Amendment challenges on adult age verification for online materials, and a lawsuit by the Mexican government against U.S. gun manufacturers. Jessica also previews potential cases related to post-election litigation and federal criminal charges against former President Trump. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Ghost Guns Case: The Supreme Court will hear a critical case regarding the regulation of ghost guns by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). The core issue is whether this regulation should be within the executive agency's power or if it requires new congressional legislation. 2️⃣ Transgender Rights for Minors : A major case this term focuses on Tennessee's 2023 law prohibiting most gender-affirming medical treatments for minors. This case could set a precedent on how transgender status is viewed under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. 3️⃣ FDA’s Authority on E-Cigarettes : The court will evaluate the power of the FDA in regulating flavored e-cigarette products. The decision hinges on whether the FDA's actions were "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedures Act. Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Breaking Down Mayor Eric Adams' Indictment: Insights from CNN's Eric Levenson 20:48
20:48
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
20:48In this episode of Passing Judgment, we delve into the recent federal indictment against New York City's mayor, Eric Adams. Jessica Levinson is joined by Eric Levenson, a senior writer for CNN Digital, who provides a comprehensive overview of Mayor Adams' background, the specifics of the charges, and the potential legal and political fallout. From his unique public persona and controversial political stances to the detailed allegations of bribery and campaign fraud, we unpack the complexities of this high-profile case. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Background of Eric Adams : Eric Adams, a former NYPD captain, Brooklyn borough president, and now mayor of New York City, is discussed. He has a mixed persona, presenting himself as a "tough on crime" candidate while also seeking to revitalize New York's nightlife. 2️⃣ The Indictment : Adams faces a federal indictment on charges including bribery, wire fraud, and solicitations of illegal campaign contributions from foreign nationals. 3️⃣ Adams’ Re-election Prospects : The indictment complicates his re-election campaign. Some politicians, like AOC, have called for his resignation, but others, including Governor Kathy Hochul, have been more cautious. Follow Our Host and Guest: @LevinsonJessica @ejleven…
P
Passing Judgment
1 Inside the 2024 Election: Electoral College, Swing States, and Election Insights with Michael Genovese 32:14
32:14
Daha Sonra Çal
Daha Sonra Çal
Listeler
Beğen
Beğenildi
32:14In this episode of Passing Judgment, political science professor Michael Genovese joins host Jessica Levinson to explore the complexities of predicting presidential elections, highlighting the electoral college's impact and the importance of swing states. Voter priorities on economic issues and the limitations of presidential power are also examined, alongside the role of media influence and hyperpolarization. Jessica and Michael dissect these intricate dynamics, the strategic significance of key battleground states, and the potential influence of celebrity endorsements on voter turnout in this episode of Passing Judgment. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss: 1️⃣ Presidential Election Complexity : Genovese highlights the unique nature of U.S. presidential elections, describing them as 50 individual races due to the electoral college. Winning requires state-specific strategies, especially targeting battleground states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. 2️⃣ Economic Priorities and Presidential Power : Both Genovese and Levinson underscore that while the economy remains a top voter concern, the president's actual influence over economic conditions is limited. 3️⃣ Celebrity Influence on Young Voters : Additionally, the significant influence of social media on voter registration, particularly among younger demographics, is discussed. Follow Our Host and Guest: @LevinsonJessica…
Player FM'e Hoş Geldiniz!
Player FM şu anda sizin için internetteki yüksek kalitedeki podcast'leri arıyor. En iyi podcast uygulaması ve Android, iPhone ve internet üzerinde çalışıyor. Aboneliklerinizi cihazlar arasında eş zamanlamak için üye olun.